VladPolskiy/gcc
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc.git synced 2025-08-16 17:10:17 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Comment spelling fix: tunning -> tuning

Browse Source 
Kyrylo noticed another spelling bug and like usually, the same mistake
happens in multiple places.

2025-07-10  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	* config/i386/x86-tune.def: Change "Tunning the" to "tuning" in
	comment and use semicolon instead of dot in comment.
	* loop-unroll.cc (decide_unroll_stupid): Comment spelling fix,
	tunning -> tuning.
This commit is contained in:
Jakub Jelinek
2025-07-10 10:23:31 +02:00
committed by Jakub Jelinek
parent 0931cea0e3
commit 60a7c817d2
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def
View File

@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTIME respectively. If not, see
- Updating ix86_issue_rate and ix86_adjust_cost in i386.md
- possibly updating ia32_multipass_dfa_lookahead, ix86_sched_reorder
and ix86_sched_init_global if those tricks are needed.
- Tunning the flags below. Those are split into sections and each
- tuning flags below; those are split into sections and each
section is very roughly ordered by importance. */
/*****************************************************************************/

2
gcc/loop-unroll.cc
View File

@ -1185,7 +1185,7 @@ decide_unroll_stupid (class loop *loop, int flags)
/* Do not unroll loops with branches inside -- it increases number
of mispredicts.
TODO: this heuristic needs tunning; call inside the loop body
TODO: this heuristic needs tuning; call inside the loop body
is also relatively good reason to not unroll. */
if (num_loop_branches (loop) > 1)
{